Blake Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds accepts GREATEST award as he showcases cringe new midlife-crisis look, but does he really deserve the award more than other Celebrities?!

Blake Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds showcased a striking new look on Tuesday as he was honored in his home country of Canada.

The Deadpool star, 48, sported a dark new hair dye job, as he was named an Officer of the Order of Canada during Canada Day festivities in Ottawa.

The couple, who’ve been entangled in ongoing lawsuit drama with It Ends With Us director Justin Baldoni, appeared unfazed by the controversy.

Putting on a brave face, Gossip Girl alum Blake, 37, looked to be in high spirits as she snapped photos of Ryan while Canada’s Governor General Mary Simon placed the medal around his neck.

Grinning from ear to ear, the actress flashed her signature megawatt smile as Ryan waved to the cheering crowd and blew kisses.

Despite the dark cloud of the It Ends With Us sexual harassment lawsuit, Ryan Reynolds appears to be on a roll, recently landing the cover of Time magazine in a feature titled ‘How Ryan Reynolds Rewrote the Script for Celebrity Entrepreneurs.’

Reynolds has made a pivot in recent years, expanding beyond Hollywood into the world of business.

His ventures — including production and marketing firm Maximum Effort — even earned a spot on TIME’s list of the 100 most influential companies.

But not everyone was buying the hype.

After Reynolds opened up about leveraging his fame to build brands and his strategy of “fastversing” (cross-promoting his own companies), some skeptical fans were quick to mock the TIME cover story, accusing the actor of buying his way in.

Critics flooded social media with sarcastic takes, including one who joked, ‘How Ryan Reynolds paid us to put him on the cover of this magazine! Lol.’

Another added, “’How Ryan Reynolds rewrote the script with maximum effort’ — very ironic of them to say this given everything he’s been exposed for.’

The medal honor comes after DailyMail.com exclusively learned that Baldoni’s lawyers will be allowed to peruse a tranche of messages exchanged by Blake and Taylor, with all communications related to It Ends With Us now set for scrutiny.

Swift and Lively’s relationship has cratered in recent months, with the singer left furious at being dragged into the case.

And she is not the only Swift to be dragged in: last week the Daily Mail revealed the subpoena against her had been withdrawn because Baldoni’s team had managed to acquire the information they were seeking – from none other than her dad Scott, 73.

‘Scott Swift did not want his daughter to be dragged into this any further and he voluntarily gave up this information as part of a deal that would include [Baldoni’s team] withdrawing their subpoena for Taylor,’ the source explained.

The pop star’s doting dad – who has played a key role in building Swift’s billion-dollar empire as her financial advisor – came to his daughter’s rescue after she was allegedly blackmailed by Lively’s lawyers.

That ‘blackmail’ revelation appeared in a legal letter filed last month by Baldoni’s lawyers, who alleged that Lively’s team had attempted to ‘coerce’ Swift to issue a public statement in support of her.

The filing claimed Lively’s lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, had contacted Swift’s team and demanded she ‘release a statement of support for Ms. Lively, intimating that, if Ms. Swift refused to do so, private text messages of a personal nature in Ms. Lively’s possession would be released.’

Swift’s team allegedly responded to Gossip Girl star Lively’s ‘inappropriate and apparently extortionate threats in at least one written communication’ sent to Gottlieb, according to the letter.

‘It is those communications that [Baldoni’s team] seeks to obtain by way of subpoena, as they would evidence an attempt to intimidate and coerce a percipient witness in this litigation,’ the letter stated.

Scott seemingly didn’t take this alleged attempt to extort his 35-year-old daughter lightly, and decided to take matters into his own hands by cooperating with Baldoni and Bryan Freedman in order to protect Swift from any further legal involvement.

‘Plain and simple – they tried to extort Taylor by threatening to release private information about her so that she would support a narrative that she was not a part of,’ our source added.

In a statement to People magazine, Gottlieb described the suggestion that Lively’s lawyers had threatened Swift as ‘categorically false.’

Lively’s lawyers later filed a motion asking the court to strike the accusations from its docket as ‘baseless, unnecessary, improper and abusive.’ The motion to dismiss the letter was granted.

However, the drama sheds further light on the collapse of the pair’s close friendship, which has gone cold amid the actress’s high-stakes lawsuit.

The drama began last December when Lively, 37, accused Baldoni, her It Ends With Us co-star and director, of sexual harassment and coordinating a smear campaign against her.

Baldoni, 41, hit back in January, with a $400 million countersuit accusing Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, of defamation.

All parties have denied the allegations. Last week, the defamation element of Baldoni’s lawsuit was scrapped by a judge, although he is still suing for civil extortion and invasion of privacy among other claims.

But contained in Baldoni’s filing were screenshots of alleged text messages, in which Lively regularly mentioned Swift by name.

In one now infamous and toe-curling exchange, Lively appeared to refer to herself as the character Khaleesi – from Game of Thrones – and to Swift as one of her ‘dragons.’

Elsewhere in Baldoni’s filing is the claim that Swift was present at a meeting convened by Lively at her New York penthouse to discuss It Ends With Us script changes.

Sources close to Swift insisted the singer had no knowledge of the meeting and simply turned up to find it underway.

Nonetheless, the whole furor reportedly left Swift – who is godmother to Lively’s three daughters – feeling ‘exploited’ by her pal of ten years.

Scott, a former stockbroker and financial advisor for Merrill Lynch, has long been credited as smoothing his daughter’s path to financial success.

A disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission lists him as linked to 10 companies affiliated with his daughter, according to Bloomberg.

Last year, he was accused of assaulting a photographer who was ‘waiting’ for Swift’s arrival off a luxury yacht in Sydney following the Australian leg of her Eras Tour.

In a statement to Daily Mail Australia at the time, a rep for Swift described the photographers as ‘aggressive’ and her father later avoided charges.

Scott isn’t the only member of Swift’s inner circle to defend the pop star amid the legal drama.

Her boyfriend, NFL star Travis Kelce, recently unfollowed Ryan Reynolds on Instagram while supermodel Gigi Hadid, another of Swift’s closest friends, has reportedly ‘iced out’ Lively in solidarity.

In a statement released to the Daily Mail, a spokesman for Lively accused Baldoni’s lawyers of repeatedly attempting to drag Swift into the case and attempting to ‘exploit’ her popularity.

It continued: ‘The Court outright denied the Wayfarer Parties’ motion to compel documents from Ms. Lively, who has produced far more documents in this case than the Wayfarer Parties combined.

‘Further, the Court’s protective order ruling rests on the Wayfarer Parties’ admission that they received nothing from Taylor Swift, which is exactly the opposite of what their ‘insider’ claimed two weeks ago.

As for the rest, Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties demanded access to Taylor Swift’s private communications—despite having already subpoenaed and then withdrawn that subpoena.

Baldoni’s desire to drag Taylor Swift into this has been constant dating back to August 2024, when the crisis PR firm led by Melissa Nathan included her in their ‘Scenario Planning’ document (Lively Amended Complaint, Exhibit D), referred to her as a bully, and called for a strategy to influence the ‘TS fan base’.

We will continue to call out Baldoni’s relentless efforts to exploit Ms Swift’s popularity, which from day one has been nothing more than a distraction from the serious sexual harassment and retaliation accusations he and the Wayfarer parties are facing.